🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding that remarks delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's win over the American player during the US Open quarter-finals. Look – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently encourage nationalism. A little bit of disappointment was appropriate. Rather, he invoked the ongoing absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the competition.

We all love a storyline, me too. But come on. Suppose Fritz had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an official match. And had he somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven grand slams (and the Spaniard went on to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). He stated in press following his defeat that he actually liked his path, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the three best competitors in the world back-to-back. Fritz is well justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the lack of American champions in mind?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and consistent victories

Fritz, 28, is placed number four in the world starting this week’s year-end championships and has won his previous six matches over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that is as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of ranking points away. His elite serve and concussive power on each front side and backhand are sufficiently adequate to defeat most rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, Fritz is often overmatched. The last several seasons has seen the interesting emergence of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming quickness and fluidity of much shorter men. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he seldom win a rally that the other player was dictating, and playing a drop shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite harsh restriction on his potential.

The American has made a number of dramatic, unexpected improvements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly surged to No 4 – and maintained the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and beating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, Sinner, and including a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing slump of US male players winning major titles when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the appreciation for the magnitude of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best run to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

The American's performance in that exact last eight match ought to have been enough of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four sets, a win that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a couple championship opportunities and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz creating numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the brink of agony. When he eventually did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a terrible game to drop serve again; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and compelled him to expend far too much effort to win it. Facing set points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve floated to the sky. He extended the match two times on his backup delivery, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, I didn’t think, only a result of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was quite compelling proof that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of the Serbian, that was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and never especially appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – the Serbian is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is those who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he could.

Fritz is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in press conferences, exceeding virtually everyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just express his emotions or the strategy he felt decided a contest, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Group

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable empire is in fact extremely unlikely for all other players. {